Posts Tagged ‘national security’
Why do Schwarzenegger, McCain, Joe Wilson, Colin Powell, James Baker and Gen. David Petraeus all praise Obama?
… on national security?
(Joe Wilson)
http://www.joewilson.house.gov/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=498
(Schwarzenegger)
http://rawstory.com/2010/01/schwarzenegger-praises-obamas-on-national-security/
(McCain, Joe Wilson, Colin Powell, James Baker and Gen. David Petraeus)
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/gop-leaders-national-security-attacks-on-obama-increasingly-at-odds-with-defense-professionals/
@ forked tongue – Are you one of those Republicans who blindly follow Rush? Or do you concede, as these others do, that Obama has done well on national security. Which is it?
What did Obama mean when he said this about citizens who protest?
“No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war.”
.
Remarks of Senator Obama: The War We Need to Win
Washington, DC | August 01, 2007
http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.php
Dear Mr. Peanut :
My logic circuit seemed to be overloaded by this:
“Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.”
The White House – President Barack Obama
Are you OK with Congress just passing legislation for a mandatory civilian national security force?
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1237576392
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388
http://www.americorps.gov/about/newsroom/releases_detail.asp?tbl_pr_id=1265
Under section 6104 of the bill, entitled “Duties,” in subsection B6, the legislation states that a commission will be set up to investigate, “Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.”
Section 120 of the bill also discusses the “Youth Engagement Zone Program” and states that “service learning” will be “a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.”
Obama told a rally in Colorado Springs, “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”
Despite denials that Obama plans to institute a mandatory program of national service, his original change.gov website stated that Americans would be “required” to complete “50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year”. The text was only later changed to state that Americans would be “encouraged” to undertake such programs.
If you believe it will be voluntary you need to see what the government said about income tax and social security when it passed those pieces of legislation.
Obama’s plan to have a National Security Force. What are your comments?
Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.
(From Associated Press)”That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”
Source:http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=d94cddm80
I believe that this is the end of the United States. Already there are comments coming from Obama’s aides regarding Obama’s “RULE” rather than his governing our country. Wake up people, before it’s too late.
fdm, Try checking out the web site for your answer, this is not gossip.
Is there anyone out there who actually thinks this is o.k.?
Please explain to me how a Civilian National Security Force is in ANY way what we as a free America should have crammed down our throats by our new president elect and his henchman Rahm Emanuel. Before you respond to this, please look at this: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80829
Victory: So, you are fine with the government requiring this? More government regulation? This is what happened in the Hitler days, and yes, there are many Rep’s screaming about this. I am one of them.
